Submit.com — Build to Share for Local Authorities.
Trusted by more than 28 of Ireland’s 31 local authorities, with 13 years of grant management experience across the public sector. Proven digital services, built alongside local authorities and ready to be adopted, configured and deployed by councils across Ireland.
With 100+ schemes already available to draw down and configure for your council in days, Submit.com turns Build to Share into a practical reality. Built in line with Ireland’s Local Government Digital & ICT Strategy 2030, councils can reuse proven digital services rather than starting from scratch, reducing duplication, accelerating delivery and building on what already works across local government.
Application, grant terms and a claim phase with evidence of the works.
Application to bring vacant space above a commercial premises back into residential use.
Eligibility led application for affordable purchase homes, with document upload.
For designated areas only: Clare, Donegal, Limerick, Mayo, Sligo and designated parts of Fingal and Wexford.
Housing service request for an extension to a council home, not a grant application.
High volume community group funding with LCDC recommendation and decision.
Capital grant with itemised costs, site consent evidence and a claim phase for drawdown.
Annual grant for community and voluntary groups.
Event funding with budget breakdown, insurance evidence and post event report.
District level allocation grant with eligibility rules built in.
Works on non public roads and lanes, with contributor consent and prioritisation.
Proposal or expression of interest gathered by the council, which then submits to the Department.
Measure 1 applications go through the local authority. Measures 2 and 3 go directly to the Department.
Recognition awards for community and voluntary work.
Structured survey to capture local community needs and priorities.
Council support grant for local Tidy Towns groups, separate from the national competition.
Grant for local recreation and sport initiatives.
Core arts funding with weighted scoring and reviewer conflict declarations.
Yearly grant for arts organisations and practitioners.
Individual artist development award with portfolio upload.
Bursary with external judges, blind review and declared conflicts of interest.
Community arts award scored against set criteria.
Project funding tied to the Creative Ireland programme.
Project award tied to the Creative Ireland programme.
Grant for cultural events and festivals, with budget fields.
Application for the national day of free creativity for young people.
Heritage project funding with site and evidence detail.
Award for culture and creativity projects.
Support funding for individual artists.
Application for a structured artist mentoring programme.
Registration and funding for Culture Night events.
Awards and bursaries across art, film and music.
Community climate projects with an outcome reporting phase built into the scheme.
Environmental grant for community groups, with evidence upload.
Grant for environmental work by community groups.
Job applications with CV upload, panel scoring and an attributable order of merit.
Staff facing HR forms gathered in one place.
Structured leave request with the details HR needs.
Worksharing request routed to the right approver.
Application form for the shorter working year scheme.
Reference request tied to a recruitment campaign.
Licence application with insurance evidence, internal consultation and fee payment.
Annual licence application for skip operators.
Licence to place a skip on a public road or footpath.
Licence for hoarding or scaffolding on a public road or footpath.
Licence to place a mobile crane or hoist on a public road or footpath.
Licence for tables and chairs on a public road or footpath.
Permit application for the movement of an abnormal load.
The library grows as councils bring us new schemes. If yours is not here, we build it with you from scratch and have it live in days, which is exactly how every scheme above started.
Your scheme then joins the library, if you are willing, so the next council does not have to build it again.
Six examples, across the departments that run the most applications. A phase is a point where the applicant is invited back in to give you something more: acceptance of the grant terms, a claim showing the funding went where they said it would, or a payment on a permit. The criteria are defaults your council edits. Sharing a scheme does not mean adopting anybody else's policy, and nothing here overrides your own published scheme rules.
Nothing is paid on a promise. The claim phase is where the applicant shows what was actually done, and payment is released against that rather than against the original application.
Built for high volume, low value rounds. Many small applications, a short assessment window, and an LCDC decision that has to be defensible months later.
Reviewer conflict of interest declarations are captured against each score. In a small arts community that is the detail these schemes are most often challenged on.
The outcome fields are set when the scheme is built, so what a group commits to measure in its application is exactly what the reporting phase asks them for.
Panel members see only what their role allows and every score is attributable, which matters when an unsuccessful candidate asks for feedback or lodges an appeal.
Internal consultation is part of the workflow rather than an email chain, so a licence held up in another section is visible instead of invisible.
Every other scheme in the library follows the same pattern. Ask us on a walkthrough and we will open a working version of the one you need.
Public bodies in Ireland carry statutory Irish language obligations, and most grant software answers them by asking you to build the form twice. Two forms means two sets of scoring criteria, two sets of edits every time a rule changes, and two versions that quietly drift apart until somebody notices at audit.
Submit.com runs the same scheme in English and in Irish from a single build. The applicant chooses their language. Your team maintains one form, one set of criteria, one approval route and one report.
When your scheme rules change, you change them once.
The hard part of a grant scheme is not the closing date. It is the Freedom of Information request four months later, the query from the Local Government Audit Service, or the councillor asking why a group in their district was refused.
Submit.com records who did what, when, and on what basis, from the first submission through to the final drawdown. When somebody asks, you can show them.





Irish local authorities procure through eTenders and the Office of Government Procurement, in line with their own procurement policy. Which route applies to your scheme is your procurement officer's call, not ours, and whichever one they choose we respond to it. You do not need to work that out before talking to us.
If you are running a competition, tell us the notice reference and we will respond to it.
The Submit.com AI agent is a single conversational layer over your own grant and drawdown data, running under the same login and permissions your team already has. It is in development, and we would rather show you how it is being built than tell you it is ready.
It arrives in two tiers. Read and summarise comes first, with no ability to modify data. Write and interact follows, and needs approval by default.
Ours or anyone else's. Training data, jurisdiction, audit trail, human approval and data processing agreements. We will email it to you.
Aligned to the Guidelines for the Responsible Use of AI in the Public Service.
Build to Share is a long standing principle in Irish public service ICT: a digital solution built by one local authority should be available to all of them, so councils are not paying separately to solve the same problem. It is the thinking behind Ireland's Local Government Digital and ICT Strategy 2030. In practice it means every scheme in this library was built for a specific council, run live with real applicants, and then made available to the others. Your council starts from a working scheme rather than a blank page.
No. You inherit the structure, meaning the phases, the field types, the reviewer roles and the reporting. You set your own eligibility criteria, scoring weights, thresholds, closing dates and approval route. Sharing a scheme does not mean standardising your policy.
We open the closest scheme with your team, work through it against your own scheme document, configure the differences, and you review it in your own instance before it goes live. Because the structure already exists, the work is tailoring rather than building. What we need from you is your current scheme document, one person who knows how the scheme actually runs, and one round of feedback.
The list is not exhaustive. We build the scheme with you from scratch, which is how every scheme currently in the library started. If you are willing, it then joins the library so the next council does not have to build it again.
Yes, from a single build. The applicant chooses their language and your team maintains one form, one set of scoring criteria and one report, rather than two parallel forms that drift apart between rounds.
Through eTenders and the Office of Government Procurement, in line with your own procurement policy. Which route applies to a given scheme is your procurement officer's call, not ours, and whichever one they choose we respond to it. Ask us and we will send a draft specification your procurement team can adapt, a completed security questionnaire, our Data Processing Agreement and reference contacts at other Irish local authorities where those councils have agreed to act as a reference.
Every application carries a full audit trail. Who viewed it, who scored it, what they scored it against, who approved it and when. Decisions record the reason as well as the outcome, and reporting is built into each scheme, so a query from the Local Government Audit Service or an FOI request can be answered from the system rather than reconstructed from email.
Submit.com is SOC 2 Type II audited, GDPR compliant and Cyber Essentials certified, with role based permissions, separation of duties between reviewers and approvers, and a full audit trail. We will share our SOC 2 report and a completed security questionnaire with your IT and data protection colleagues on request.
No. The Submit.com AI agent is in development and we are not marketing it as finished. It arrives in two tiers and the read only tier comes first: browsing and listing applications and drawdowns, summarising an individual application, free form questions over live data and report generation, with no ability to modify data. The write tier requires approval by default. What is already settled is the governance. It stays off until an administrator switches it on, it only sees what the logged in user can see, every action is logged with user, timestamp, input and output, irreversible actions require human approval, and a signed Data Processing Agreement is required before any customer data is processed. We are happy to walk your data protection officer through it before there is anything to buy.
Twenty minutes, no slides. We will open the closest scheme in the library, walk through it against your own rules, and tell you honestly whether it is a close fit or a build.